The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact [email protected] for any How can perspectives and tools from In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. All Please note that in contrast to Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them With great power comes great responsibility! Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. technical soundness. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. rejected without review. This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. He. : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. the same reviewing rubric as all papers. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Note that IL , ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. adjustments to the program committee. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]; while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to [email protected]. You can read more on any of the above points here. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance rejected without review. Questions? formal proceedings. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. above areas when they register their submissions. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. third-person. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal [1] ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM papers will be released prior to the conference. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Papers Extensions of If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. We will use The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. submission area(s) by Sept 30. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. form. ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity.