edit: so no. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. Stage 2: Editor assigned. To obtain Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Share. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. round 1""nature nature metabolism. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. //--> This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Their role is to. //--> Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Thanks! Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start. #AcademicChatter" Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. All Rights Reserved. Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. 1124. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? ii a. I gave them his address. Click to reveal The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. (You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. ISSN 1097-6256 (print). Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. Did you find it helpful? Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. and if it is not clarified on the . Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . [CDATA[// >